Chapter IV, §1 — Housing and the Tasks of a Transition

V. I. Lenin · The State and Revolution

The source opens on its original site. The summary and questions below are original study material.

Section summary

Engels's discussion of housing lets Lenin test the distinction between changing the purpose of public action and changing its institutional form. Both an existing state and a workers' state could issue orders about the use of dwellings, but Lenin argues that an apparatus tied to property owners would be unsuitable for carrying out a transformation in workers' interests. Similar administrative acts can therefore have different social content.

He also distinguishes collective ownership from simply turning each worker into a small proprietor. Social ownership does not necessarily eliminate every payment or allocation rule immediately. Collecting rent and assigning housing could remain transitional tasks without requiring the old privileged bureaucracy. This is a historically situated discussion of Engels's proposals, not an assertion that every present-day housing shortage has the same cause or solution. Its broader lesson is that ending a property relation and resolving all questions of distribution are different problems.

Key claims

Lenin separates the social purpose of housing policy from the institutional apparatus that implements it.
Collective ownership differs from distributing individual property titles to workers.
Allocation rules and payments may persist during a transition without establishing that the old state apparatus is indispensable.

Pause & reflect

For discussion

Use these questions for individual reflection or a study circle. Return to the passage to support your answer.

Why might the same formal act of allocating housing serve different class relationships?
What problems would collective ownership leave unresolved about maintenance, use, and allocation?
How would you test Engels's claim about available housing in its own historical setting before applying it elsewhere?

Terms in context

expropriation: The transfer of assets out of private ownership; its meaning here concerns changes in property relations, not a practical procedure.
collective ownership: Ownership exercised on behalf of a social body rather than as separate private holdings.
transition: A period in which inherited practices and new social relations coexist and change unevenly.

Your reading notebook

Private annotation

One note for this section, saved only in this browser on this device. Notes are not uploaded or shared. Clearing site data removes them; private browsing may not retain them.